Resilient LLP (formerly DeMarco Allan LLP)
Tag

Cap-and-Trade

Browsing

ECCC Publishes Discussion Paper and Launches Consultation on Effective Carbon Markets

No Comments By

Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) recently published a discussion paper on “Driving effective carbon markets in Canada” (the Discussion Paper). The Discussion Paper sets out proposed changes to the federal benchmark criteria ahead of the federal government’s review next year. ECCC also launched consultations on the Discussion Paper, seeking comments and responses to questions included in the Discussion Paper from stakeholders.  This bulletin briefly summarizes the key topic areas, current requirements, the federal government’s proposal and considerations, and next steps set out in the Discussion Paper. Common scope of coverage Current requirement. The current benchmark requires that carbon pricing systems maintain a common scope, covering, at a minimum, an equivalent percent of combustion emissions as the federal backstop. It also requires market-based systems to cover industrial process emissions, and to limit eligibility for OBPSs, performance rebates, or the free allocation of allowances to sectors that are at risk of carbon leakage and competitiveness impacts of carbon pricing. Proposals and considerations. ECCC notes that the removal of the fuel charge (see our earlier bulletin here) requires rethinking how scope of coverage should work. The federal government is considering the following three options to modify the benchmark to specify the common scope criteria explicitly to ensure consistent minimum coverage across systems: Option 1: A threshold-based approach that would cover all facilities in specific sectors emitting above a certain level annually. Thresholds under consideration are 10kt per year (Option 1A) and 25kt per year (Option 1B). Option 1A would cover a large number of facilities and industrial activities, which would support market function and liquidity, but could create intra-sectoral competitiveness risks in some sectors. Option 1B would reduce these risks by covering fewer industrial activities where there is a significant split between emissions above and below the threshold, but may negatively impact market function…

Read More
By

Ontario to Introduce Legislation Requiring a Referendum on New Carbon Pricing

No Comments By

Ontario Premier Doug Ford yesterday announced that the government intends to introduce legislation next week that would require a referendum before any new provincial carbon pricing system could be implemented in the province. The measure is expected to be part of new legislation, the “Get It Done Act” (the Act), which is set to be tabled in the upcoming legislative session starting February 20, 2024. A carbon pricing referendum would only apply to proposed provincial measures and not the federal backstop carbon pricing system under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA) that went into effect in Ontario after the provincial government cancelled Ontario’s cap-and-trade system. Premier Ford noted that the aim of the Act is to give voters a direct say over any new provincial carbon tax, cap-and-trade system, or other carbon pricing program, and emphasized the importance of keeping costs low for residents and businesses. The Act is expected to include a host of measures that build on the government’s commitments to streamline approvals for major infrastructure projects and housing, lower costs for people and businesses, and support economic growth. Ontario’s Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy (the Minister) stated that the government made a promise to fight the federal fuel charge (see our bulletin on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision upholding the constitutionality of the GGPPA here) and that it would continue to lead by example by “giving Ontarians certainty that carbon pricing on the backs of taxpayers is not the way forward.” The Minister suggested that “[a]ny new provincial carbon tax is unacceptable for Ontario residents who are seeing their hard-earned dollars stretched further than ever.”  The provincial government also called on the federal government to expand the temporary pause on the application of the federal fuel charge for home heating or to eliminate the federal carbon fuel charge entirely.   For further information or to discuss the contents…

Read More
By

Federal Government Strengthens Carbon Pricing Benchmark Stringency Criteria

No Comments By

The federal government has issued its strengthened benchmark stringency criteria in line with previously announced increases to the carbon price (rising at $15/tonne per year to $170/tonne by 2030). The government previously indicated its intent to strengthen the benchmark stringency criteria for the post-2022 period in September 2020. The government intends to seek confirmation from provinces and territories on whether they intend to maintain or implement a carbon pricing system for the 2023-2030 period and assess provincial and territorial submissions against the updated federal benchmark criteria in 2022 for the 2023 to 2030 period. The 2016 benchmark continues to apply for assessments of carbon pollution pricing system stringency for the 2018-2022 period. Provinces and territories must implement (a) an explicit price-based system (i.e., (i) a carbon levy on fossil fuels, or (ii) a hybrid system comprised of a carbon levy on fossil fuels and an output-based pricing system for industry) or (b) a cap-and-trade system. Partial explicit price-based system must be designed to fully replace either the federal fuel charge or the federal OBPS. Where a province or territory implements a partial system that does not fully replace the federal fuel charge or OBPS, the corresponding federal backstop system part (i.e., fuel charge or OBPS) will apply in full in the jurisdiction. The updated benchmark sets new requirements for both explicit price-based systems and cap-and-trade systems, in the following areas: Explicit price-based systems: (i) carbon price ($65/tonne in 2023, rising $15 per year to $170/tonne in 2030); (ii) common scope; (iii) price signal (no measures to offset, reduce or negate); (iv) stringency of output-based pricing systems (OBPS) for industry; (v) restriction on OBPS and performance-based rebate approaches under a carbon levy; (vi) offset credits; and (vii) public reporting. Cap-and-trade systems: (i) maximum emissions cap (corresponding at minimum to projected emissions levels…

Read More
By