Author

DT Vollmer

Browsing

The European Commission (EC) yesterday announced its first “Omnibus” package of proposals  aimed at simplifying EU rules, boosting competitiveness, and unlocking additional investment capacity. The package consists of two main proposals: (i) “Omnibus I”, which focuses on reducing reporting and compliance burdens and costs of and the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities (EU Taxonomy), postponing the entry into application of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and simplifying the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM); and (ii) “Omnibus II”, which would amend the regulations for the InvestEU Program to increase its size, efficiency, and accessibility. If adopted, these measures are expected to generate annual administrative cost savings of approximately €6.3 billion and mobilize an additional €50 billion in public and private investment through InvestEU. This bulletin summarizes key amendments included in Omnibus I and Omnibus II: CSRD and EU Taxonomy. The proposed changes in sustainability reporting under the CSRD and EU Taxonomy include: Narrower CSRD scope. Removing around 80% of companies from CSRD requirements, focusing obligations on the largest companies with the greatest environmental and social impact. The reporting requirements would only apply to large undertakings with more than 1,000 employees on average (i.e., undertakings that have more than 1,000 employees and either a turnover above €50 million or a balance sheet above €25 million) Protection for smaller companies. Ensuring large companies’ reporting requirements do not create excessive burdens for smaller businesses in their value chains. Delayed compliance. Postponing CSRD reporting requirements by two years (until 2028) for companies originally scheduled to report in 2026 or 2027. Limit on EU Taxonomy reporting. Reducing the reporting burden and limiting mandatory EU Taxonomy reporting to the largest companies (aligning with the CSDDD), while allowing voluntary reporting for others. Proportionate standard for voluntary reporting. Issuing a recommendation on voluntary sustainability reporting as soon as possible, based on European Financial Reporting Advisory Group’s (EFRAG) sustainability reporting standard for voluntary use by SMEs that are not in…

Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) today published the preliminary draft Direct Air Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage federal offset protocol (the DACCS Protocol). The DACCS Protocol is intended to create an incentive for proponents to undertake projects that capture carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the atmosphere and store it in subsurface geological formations. Eligible projects would be able to generate federal offset credits under the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit System Regulations (see our earlier bulletin here).   Overview. Eligible projects under the DACCS Protocol must generate CO2 removals (CDRs) from the storage of CO2 captured directly from the atmosphere in onshore, subsurface geological formations. Project sites must be located in Canada, in a single province or territory, and the capture facility within the project site must have been operating on or after January 1, 2022. Projects cannot take place on land that is not covered by a CO2 geological storage regulatory framework and CDRs cannot be generated from (i) the storage of point-source captured CO2 (e.g. an industrial facility), (ii) the storage of CO2 in any materials or products (e.g. concrete and mining waste), or (iii) the use of CO2 for the purposes of enhanced oil recovery (EOR).    Eligible project activities. Eligible project activities under the DACCS Protocol include: Operation of a capture facility within the project site. There is no restriction on the specific direct air CO2 capture processes used, including liquid solvents, solid sorbents, or any other existing or emerging methods. Further, during the crediting period, the capture facility within the project site may provide captured CO2 for purposes/end uses other than CO2 geological storage.  Operation of transport infrastructure within the project site (e.g. pipeline, rail, truck). The DACCS Protocol provides that the transport infrastructure within the project site used to transport the captured CO2 may have been operating prior to January 1, 2017,…

The six largest US banks, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citi, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley have each announced their departure from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a group of leading global banks committed to aligning their lending, investment, and capital markets activities with net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. In Canada, TD, BMO, and National Bank announced their withdrawal from the NZBA earlier today. RBC has also indicated that it is open to leaving the alliance. We anticipate significant changes in the NZBA and additional withdrawals over the coming days. Major US asset managers are also leaving other UN-convened climate coalitions, including the recently announced departure of BlackRock from the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative (NZAM), a multi-trillion dollar international group of asset managers committed to supporting the goal of net zero GHG emissions by 2050. Following BlackRock’s departure, a statement issued by NZAM on Monday indicates that it is suspending activities while the initiative undergoes review “to ensure NZAM remains fit for purpose in the new global context.” Both NZBA and NZAM are organizations under the umbrella of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), co-chaired by Michael Bloomberg and Mark Carney.    For further information or to discuss the contents of this bulletin, please contact Lisa DeMarco at lisa@resilientllp.com.

The United States today submitted its updated Nationally Determined Contribution (“NDC”) under the Paris Agreement to the UN Climate Change secretariat. The updated NDC sets an economy-wide target of reducing net greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions by 61-66 percent below 2005 levels by 2035 (the “Target”). The Target increases ambition from the previous target of 50-52% below 2005 levels by 2030, and provides a pathway to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. President-elect Donald Trump, who will take office on January 20, 2025, is widely expected to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement on the first day of his new administration. Many observers are consequently treating the new NDC as mostly symbolic. See our earlier analysis on U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement here.   This bulletin briefly summarizes key details of the NDC and the Biden-Harris Administration’s Fact Sheet on the Target.   Net-zero by 2050. The Target aligns with President Joe Biden’s goal of a net zero GHG economy no later than 2050, with the 61-66% range on a “straight line or steeper trajectory to net zero emissions by 2050 for all greenhouse gases.”   Article 6. The NDC is very light on international cooperation through now-finalized rules of international carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Notably, however, the new NDC omits language included in the last U.S. NDC, which indicated that the U.S. did “not intend to use voluntary cooperation using cooperative approaches referred to in Article 6.2 or the mechanism referred to in Article 6.4 in order to achieve its target.”   Methane and other emissions. The updated NDC does not set sub-targets for individual GHGs; however, as part of achieving the Target, it is anticipated that methane emissions will also be reduced by at least 35% from 2005 levels by 2035. The Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) provides…

Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change (the “Minister”) yesterday announced the finalization and publication today of the Clean Electricity Regulations (“CER”) in the Canada Gazette, Part II (see our earlier bulletin on the draft CER here). CER establishes significant annual emission limits (“AEL”) to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions from fossil fuel-generated electricity generation facilities in all provinces and territories across Canada starting in 2035. Requirements to reduce emissions under CER start in 2035 with a pathway to reaching net-zero in 2050. Environment and Climate Change Canada (“ECCC”) estimates that the CER would reduce approximately 181 megatonnes of cumulative GHG emissions between 2024 and 2050. The CER imposes significant registration, record keeping, and reporting obligations on covered electricity generation facilities.   This bulletin briefly summarizes the key provisions of CER and federal financial support to help decarbonize and expand Canada’s electricity system.   Scope. A “unit” is regulated under the CER if it meets all of the following three criteria: It has an electricity generation capacity of 25 megawatts (“MW”) or greater (or is a new unit located at a facility where the sum of all new electricity generation unit capacity is 25 MW or greater); It generates electricity using fossil fuel; and It is connected, directly or indirectly, to an “electricity system” that is subject to North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”) standards. A unit that has an electricity generation capacity of less than 25 MW is deemed to meet the first criteria if the unit’s commissioning date is on or after January 1, 2025 and the sum of the electricity generation capacity of all units, other than planned units, that are located at the facility where the unit is located and that also have commissioning dates on or after January 1, 2025 is at least 25 MW.   CER does not apply…